Last two years brought an amazing change in my art, one that all artists wish for. I am thrilled, delighted, amazed, and hope this wave will keep on going. Lots of paintings in my head, waiting to show up….. my wish for 2012 is that it will continue. 
Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category
2010 and 2011 , and a wish for 2012
Friday, December 30th, 2011Art studio lights
Friday, December 30th, 2011I have been trying to find information about lighting for art studio , and in a process getting lots of ideas but none worked out. An architect suggested new fluorescent full spectrum tubes. I bought and installed 2 eight feet long light fixtures with 8 four feet long tubes, 5,000K. The first time I turned on the switch, it was amazing. I can paint now at night. There is a difference in color, small, and colors don’t loose anything when looked at in natural day light, or fluorescent. What a treat !
Here is a new painting . An idea came from a photograph taken by my daughter.
Alterrealism
Tuesday, September 20th, 2011Many times people discover new ideas at the same time. All but one is remembered.
Laurent Loty and I discovered idea and named it alterrealism at the same time; only we are planning to work on it together,
and hope to bring more people in. We talked on the phone the other day, from Paris to Berkeley.
I love my life.
How much?
Tuesday, September 20th, 2011Laurent Loty on alterrealism
Tuesday, September 20th, 2011“…..continue the struggle against the enemies of utopia who accuse all utopias of
unrealism, I have invented a word: “alterrealism”. Utopia must be neither
realist nor unrealistic, but alterrealist
Dialogue is or should be the predominant form for the genre which
connects fiction and reality, belief and demystification. It is this form that
allows an escape from the authoritarian monologue of a perfect world. Dialogue
allows a distanced kind of belief.”
about writer and critic by A. Wat
Friday, September 9th, 2011Here is a beautiful thought about artist/critic relationship:
“However the relationship between a writer and his critics may form, the fundamental attitude is one of conflict. A conflict of interest and disposition. As a matter of fact, the scholar(and the critic) attempts to understand and communicate the underlaying principles of the work’s knowhow, and to summarize in his own words what the writer wants to say. At the same time, the writer is most profoundly reluctant to obtain any knowledge of these principles and intentions. He is terrified of this self-revelation, as if by the exposure of a magic secret. Since every authentic writer perceives his work as valuable only when he feels in it the supreme presence of something which was absent in his brain before he started writing, and only this conscious or unconscious feeling of the mysterious gain, of a surplus value presented to him, becomes his anointment… His relationship to his creation is demiurgic: nhe wants to tell himself: “And saw that it was good,” as in Genesis, yet more obviously and much more powerfully he does not want to know, why and how it is good… The exposed creation turnes immedistely into a depersonalized set of mechanical devices and soulless tricks. ”
This applies to all visual and performing artists. So well described – but does it make sense in 2011 ? He wrote it in 1963
Laurent Loty
Friday, September 9th, 2011I was happy to hear from Laurent that he accepted to be a honorary member of alterrealism,
and we will be working on it together.
your art is pretty
Saturday, September 3rd, 2011I got in touch with an old friend named Henry after many years . He is a wonderful man who loves art, is very supportive of artists, and has a gallery. He looked at my web site . His first comment was ” it is scary, remove those doll paintings from your website”. So I sent him other images I thought he might enjoy. I have to tell you, you are very talented, I like your Monroe piece, good concept, but your paintings are pretty. And it is no complement, but an insult . ”
He told me that Jose Tola is very good painter whos art is not pretty. I looked him up. ”Henry,to me, his art is decorative, flat, and PRETTY. ”
So here I am, trying to figure out where his comment is coming from. I like him and because of it value his comment, but it does not make sense.
I will see him in a month, and hope to learn more where he is coming from.
The comments I enjoy the most are those made by people who have nothing with art as a profession. They often are very profound, clear, and meaningful.
the Universe is a symphony of vibrating strings
Sunday, May 8th, 2011Michio Kaku: I work in something called String Theory, that’s what I do for a living. In fact, that’s my day job. I’m the co-founder of String Field Theory, one of the main branches of String Theory. The latest version of String Theory is called M-Theory, “M” for membrane. So we now realize that strings can coexist with membranes. So the subatomic particles we see in nature, the quartz, the electrons are nothing but musical notes on a tiny vibrating string.
What is physics? Physics is nothing but the laws of harmony that you can write on vibrating strings. What is chemistry? Chemistry is nothing but the melodies you can play on interacting vibrating strings. What is the universe? The universe is a symphony of vibrating strings. And then what is the mind of God that Albert Einstein eloquently wrote about for the last 30 years of his life? We now, for the first time in history have a candidate for the mind of God. It is, cosmic music resonating through 11 dimensional hyperspace.
So first of all, we are nothing but melodies. We are nothing but cosmic music played out on vibrating strings and membranes. Obeying the laws of physics, which is nothing but the laws of harmony of vibrating strings. But why 11? It turns out that if you write a theory in 15, 17, 18 dimensions, the theory is unstable. It has what are called, anomalies. It has singularities. It turns out that mathematics alone prefers the universe being 11 dimensions.
Now some people have toyed with 12 dimensions. At Harvard University, for example, some of the physicists there have shown that a 12-dimensional theory actually looks very similar to an 11-dimensional theory except it has two times, double times rather than one single time parameter. Now, what would it be like to live in a universe with double time? Well, I remember a movie with David Niven. David Niven played a pilot, who was shot down over the Pacific, but the angels made a mistake, he was not supposed to die that day. And so the angels brought him back to life and said, “Oh, sorry about that. We killed you off by accident; you were not supposed to die today.”
So in a great scene, David Niven then walks through a city where time has stopped. Everyone looks like this. And there’s David Niven just wandering around looking at all these people. That’s a world with double time. David Niven has one clock, but everyone else has a separate clock and these two clocks are perpendicular to each other. So if there’s a double time universe, you could walk right into a room, see people frozen in time, while you beat to a different clock. That’s a double time universe.
Now this is called F-Theory, “F” for father, the father of strings. It’s not known whether F-Theory will survive or not; however, M-Theory in 11 dimension is the mother of all strings. And that theory works perfectly fine. So to answer your question, in other dimensions, dimensions beyond 11, we have problems with stability, these theories are unstable, they decay back down to 11 dimensions, they have what are called anomalies, singularities, which kill an ordinary theory. So the mathematics itself forces you to 11 dimensions.
Also because this is a Theory of Everything, there’s more room in higher dimensions to put all the forces together. When you put gravity, electromagnetism and the nuclear force together, four dimensions is not big enough to accommodate all these forces. When you expand to 11 dimensions, bingo, everything forms perfectly well.
screen saver
Sunday, May 8th, 2011Joshua Peterson (Design2market.inc) created a screen saver with my ” Shoe ” paintings. It is free to download and use. Hope you enjoy it!
The shoes I painted are designed by Christian Louboutin. Here is a story about him from Wikipedia:
“As a child, Louboutin would regularly sneak out of school, from the age of 12, to visit the flea market of Vila do Conde, where all the gipsies loved his shoes. Although Louboutin faced much opposition following his decision to leave school so early, he claims that his resolve was strengthened after watching an interview on TV with Elizabeth Taylor in which she introduced her sister, saying she had to leave school when she was only 12 but when she turned 50 she got her degree. “Everybody applauded! And I thought, ‘Well, at least if I regret it I’m going to be like the sister of Elizabeth Taylor!’”






